Marketing Mobile technology

The Return of Spam Calls

Have you been getting more spam calls lately?

Of course you are. Everyone is in spite of the Do Not Call (DNC) Registry. So what’s going on?

DNC Can’t Keep Up With Phone Technology

Actually, the DNC list worked pretty well back in the day. It came from early anti-spam legislation and was set up in 2003 to target telemarketers with bad phone manners. If they were legitimate players, they could be fined so they had an incentive to obey the law. (Spammers are notorious for making quick exits from the public eye.)

Back then, the Internet was still young and innocent. You couldn’t abuse it to place a ton of spam calls all at once.

Crooks, of course, could care less and frequently changed their phone numbers to stay ahead of DNC blocks. Later, prepaid, disposable mobile phones made this even easier.

And then VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) tech was introduced as a call center management tool. VoIP services are excellent for legitimate use and provide valuable marketing data. But like any business tool, it can also be used by a single crook to place a lot of hard-to-trace and harder-to-stop calls from ever-changing phone numbers.

Some Spam Comes From Outside the US

I bet you’re shocked to read this. Like spam email, lots of spam calls come from outside the US where DNC isn’t the law and can’t be enforced.

“Is that you, Vladamir? I told you to stop calling me!”

It isn’t just Russia that’s doing all this phone spam. India is a big actor, too. Since it’s a friendly nation, it goes after phone spammers. Earlier this year, Indian police tracked and shut down a call center in Mumbai behind one of the “this is the IRS” scams. 

Of course, there are plenty of US-based spammers. The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, an arm of the Treasury Department, busted such a group working out of Miami at around the same time. (Like they say, if it’s from Florida….)

Woman on phone asking a ridiculous question to a spammer.
Another response to phone spam: “Will the IRS accept my Fry’s gas points?”

The more you read about phone spam, the weirder it gets and the more you wonder about people who fall for these schemes. I can understand an elderly person getting alarmed by the “your grandchild is in danger — send money!” scam.

But a scammer who demands payment in iTunes cards, as Forbes’ Kelly Phillips Erb reports, should definitely be a red flag. 

Block that Spam!

Many people just won’t answer a call from a number they don’t recognize. Merging your phone with your Outlook or Gmail contacts will let you know who’s calling before you pick up.

If a call is important, they’ll leave a voicemail, right? Right, but you might have to listen to a lot of them (although not all spammers leave them) and the number doesn’t get reported. 

Or you can take the route of my friend Nicole, who listed a table and chairs to sell on Craig’s list earlier this year.

Almost immediately, a spammer texted her with a long spiel about being out of town, but really wants her stuff. He would pay her through PayPal, a friend will pick up the table, etc.

Nicole responded by text-spamming him back several times with messages that ranged from changing the number of available chairs to requesting a picture and asking if the person was married. Eventually, the spammer blocked her calls, which while ironic, is an excellent way to reduce spam calls and texts.

I use Truecaller, which relies on people reporting spam and then shares the information with its network. So I can see whether a number has been reported as spam, and even how many people reported it.

You can also reassure Truecaller when a caller is legit by suggesting a name. But some people do want their names kept private, so be careful when you do this.

Reporting spam to the service app of your choice and to the DNC —even if they’re from other countries—can help us beat the spammers at their own game.

New Spam Calling Tricks

The latest trick I’ve seen on my phone are spammers who use the local area code, thinking I’m more likely to accept a local call. They’re right, but I’ve caught on.

Then, there are robocalls that try to sound like a real person. It’s usually a woman asking if you can hear her and once you reply, the rest of the tape starts rolling. Be very careful about this: your response is recorded and used for illicit means. It’s amazing what doors open with “yes” or even “yeah.”

Some robo-spam can even answer the question “are you a real person?” Clever, huh?

Text spam is particularly annoying and alarming. Don’t click on any links from a number you don’t recognize. You don’t know where they will take you.

Legitimate Businesses Must Avoid Looking Spammy

The sad thing is, spammers are harming legitimate marketing outreach. Law-abiding companies that do outreach like this need to be extra careful.

I recently tried HomeSmart to get some quotes for a new air condition unit “to be purchased at a later date.” I immediately got about three calls, and a couple more the next day.

A mere 12 hours after I placed the request, HomeSmart called me to ask if I’ve received information and would I like to turn off the reques

I received calls a day later and many were identified as spammers. HomeSmart has a pretty good reputation about vetting the vendors it recommends, so I’m sure these people were OK. But this is another twist to phone marketing that makes email marketing look even better.

Marketing Mobile technology

Copy and Paste Confusion

It started about a year ago: Facebook friends began asking to copy and paste, not “just” share. Or even, don’t share at all!

At first, I ignored this advice and continued to share. Part of the reason is that I usually read my Facebook feed through an app on my Samsung tablet. It doesn’t let me copy and paste.

I’ve been trying to sort out this copy and paste situation. Does it give a post more exposure? Does it prevent it from becoming garbled like the old children’s game Telephone?

Or will it expose the obedient to spammers?

Does ‘Copy and Paste’ Spread the Message Better?

I’ve spent some time researching the claim that a copy and paste will be spread a post further than a share. I have not found a shred of evidence to support this.

Let me rephrase:

I haven’t found a shred of reputable evidence that copying and pasting content results in more publicity or reads.

Demands to copy and paste will backfire.
Don’t ask for people to copy and paste too often.

Facebook’s algorithm depends on sharing content to determine trends.  I’m sure it can also see the same information via copy and paste, but its algorithm relies on sharing content.

Among other things, this helps Facebook determine where to show advertisements and other items it believes individual users would want to see.

These ads are why Facebook is free.

I’m also a little puzzled about the supposed benefits of copy and paste because sharing essentially is just that. It also maintains the original message.

Copying and pasting a post can mangle the message if it’s done selectively.

Omitting certain words is a common way to manipulate statements. We know this. This also leads to the social media sickness known as fake news.

Facebook is Sick of Fake News

Facebook has taken it on the chin for its role in permitting the fake news phenomenon.

Put aside the question of how much fake news played a role in the Presidential election. It played a role in a shooting at a DC pizzeria. A nutcase saw a fake news post somewhere (it was on a lot of social media channels) alleging a DC pizzeria was actually a child sex ring run to benefit of Hillary Clinton.

Nut Job decided to learn more. He drove from his home in North Carolina about a month after the election to “self-investigate,” according to the Washington Post. He brought with him his trusty AR-15 and Colt .38.

Apparently, “self-investigations” begin with shooting a premise. Luckily no one was hit.

Of course, there was absolutely no evidence of a child sex ring at this restaurant. Or that the Clinton campaign had a nefarious involvement with pizza and/or children. It is true that some Clinton campaign employees ate at this particular pizza joint and recommended it in emails to other pizza-loving friends.

This episode demonstrates that some people will believe anything that suits their pre-existing opinions.

And while fake news no doubt helped Facebook keep its #1 social media ranking, Zuckerberg et. al. have had enough and are cracking down. A team of people now investigate suspicious news pages. And it’s taking other steps to control Facebook from being used for purposes it doesn’t like.

Facebook has long punished frequent “Like baiting” that easily morphs into spam. It’s very likely doing the same thing with users who frequently request readers to  copy and paste.

Keep on asking people to do this, and you’ll find your posts may be curtailed.

Furthermore, this tactic is also used by people who are perpetuating hoaxes (like the pizza story above) according to ThatsNonsense, a site that targets Facebook and other social media that fall prey to scams. When you copy and paste, you’re creating a new post that makes the original one difficult for Facebook to track down. It makes it harder for Facebook to flag posts that can cause harm, are libelous, or just plain false.

Let’s Keep Facebook Civil

I’ve seen some friends ask to return Facebook to simpler times when only noncontroversial items were discussed. Ironically, this includes at least two who in the past posted some fairly outrageous material.

I’d like to think they have reconsidered their behavior. Still, it’s a bit much that they are more or less demanding this from people whose posts are far less strident.

The copy and paste scheme is also been abused by people trying to guilt others into doing something they want. It’s a passive-aggressive approach. “If you really are my friend / care about victims of <fill in the illness/tragedy> / love your <family member>, you’ll share this.”

This isn’t good Internet etiquette. Sure, Facebook is a great way to share your pain, opinions, and photos of a new grandnephew. Insisting that people share, or copy and paste your post is annoying. I saw this sentiment over and over again in my research.

I am not saying don’t ask people to share an occasional post or page. Sometimes, it’s a good way to get people to help with a specific project. This is different than saying “if you care, you’ll share” or some other Johnny Cochran-like plea.

Facebook is a good place to identify trends and even get some news, or get a sense of what other people see as news. It’s a public forum. I do not want to see political commentary shut down.

But beware: using terms like “libbies” or “wingnut” (unless you’re discussing font options) is going to tell Facebook and the world that you aren’t to be taken seriously anyway.

As John Lennon once sang,

“If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain’t gonna make with anyone anyhow.”